首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of the quality of existing patient educational tools focused on sudden cardiac arrest: a systematic evaluation by the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Thought Leadership Alliance
【2h】

Assessment of the quality of existing patient educational tools focused on sudden cardiac arrest: a systematic evaluation by the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Thought Leadership Alliance

机译:评估针对突发性心脏骤停的现有患者教育工具的质量:突发性心脏骤停思想领袖联盟进行的系统评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundConveying contemporary treatment options for those at risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is challenging. The purpose of the present research was to evaluate the quality and usability of available patient educational tools relevant to SCA and its treatment options, such as implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). We hypothesized that this review would identify gaps in areas of information for the enhancement of patient education and decision-making materials.MethodsWe used a formal instrument to assess specific domains of content, development, and effectiveness of 18 available SCA and ICD educational tools. The multidisciplinary review panel included two electrophysiologists, two general cardiologists, a cardiac psychologist, a health services researcher, and a patient advocate.ResultsOf the 18 education tools, four were rated as “good, may need revisions, but sufficient for use”, 12 were rated as “marginal, needs revision prior to use”, and two were rated as “poor, inadequate for use”. None of the tools were rated as being of “very good” or “excellent” quality.ConclusionThere appear to be opportunities to improve the quality and completeness of existing educational tools for patients with SCA and ICD. While many tools have been developed, they fall below current standards for supporting informed medical decision-making.
机译:背景技术为有心脏骤停(SCA)危险的人提供当代治疗选择具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估与SCA及其治疗选择有关的可用患者教育工具(例如植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD))的质量和可用性。我们假设这次审查将发现信息领域的空白,以增强患者的教育和决策材料。方法我们使用一种正式的工具来评估18种可用的SCA和ICD教育工具的内容,发展和有效性的特定领域。多学科评审小组包括两名电生理学家,两名心脏病专家,一名心脏病心理学家,一名健康服务研究人员以及一名患者倡导者。结果在18种教育工具中,有4种被评为“良好,可能需要修订,但足以使用”,12被评定为“边际,需要在使用前进行修改”,两个被评定为“差,不能充分使用”。没有一种工具的质量被评为“非常好”或“出色”。结论似乎有机会提高针对SCA和ICD患者的现有教育工具的质量和完整性。尽管已经开发了许多工具,但它们仍低于当前标准,无法支持明智的医疗决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号